The Challenge of absorbing and spending the EU recovery funds
Zsolt Darvas from Bruegel, the economic “Think Tank” based in Brussels, analyzes in this article the use of the recovery funds of the European Union, finding how for some countries such as Spain or Italy "absorbing all these funds could be an immense challenge".
The article shows how Spain and Italy would only have used 39% and 40% respectively of the total of the European structural funds for the period 2014-2020. Both would be the countries with the lowest utilization rates (absorption rate) in the European Union as a whole and yet the largest beneficiaries of Next Generation EU recovery funds (NGEU).
That low absorption capacity of European funds, together with the fact that the NGEU recovery and resilience funds will have a much faster disbursement schedule than usual, will imply a huge challenge for some countries to spend them timely.
According to the author, absorbing these funds should not be an objective in itself, but to guarantee that they are used well: “Some countries might struggle to spend what they can get, even if they will have broad freedom to design spending programs. The focus should be on worthwhile spending, not just on absorbing EU funds”.
Filter results
According to Ramón Casilda, the EU–Mercosur agreement will generate annual tariff savings of around €4 billion, which is significantly higher than the savings expected under the agreements with Canada and Japan.
Economist José Carlos Díez notes that Spain’s banking sector has an excess of deposits and sufficient liquidity to meet the credit demand of companies and households, and does so at the lowest interest rates in Europe, according to the ECB.
According to CEPS, regulatory and supervisory complexity acts as a structural constraint on integration, investment and market depth, with costs that weigh most heavily on smaller institutions, new entrants and cross-border business models.
According to the ECB, an efficient, secure and integrated payment system would strengthen the international role of the euro and deliver benefits such as lower financing costs, reduced exposure to exchange rate fluctuations and greater protection against sanctions.
According to the IEA one key debate in the EU on financial regulation simplification is whether to explicitly include competitiveness, efficiency or contribution to growth as objectives of the regulatory agencies, following the UK example.
According to IE University’s Center for the Governance of Change, deeper and more integrated financial markets would strengthen the euro’s global role. This requires, among other elements, resilient and interoperable payment systems and completing the banking union.
Partnerships between banks and private credit: The winners will be those that combine bank underwriting discipline, distribution, and customer access with private capital’s appetite for long-dated, illiquid risk, according to Oliver Wyman.
Lucrezia Reichlin (CEPR): A CBDC is not a prerequisite for monetary sovereignty. Confusing money with payments can risk misdiagnosing the problem and misaligning economic policy efforts.
According to the World Economic Forum´s Global Risk Report 2026, geoeconomic confrontation, mis- and disinformation and societal polarization make up the top three short-term risks, while environmental risks dominate in the long term.
According to the World Economic Forum, over the last few years AI has moved from experimentation to workflow integration, promising systemic gains in productivity while also raising critical questions around economic inclusion, values, trust and resilience.
According to AFME, a clearer, more coherent, and proportionate regulatory environment, without unnecessary layers and focuses on growth and competitiveness, is keyl to increase investor confidence, unlock private capital and deepen European capital markets
According to the Center for the Governance of Change at IE University, Europeans support technological progress if it reinforces security, inclusion, and social welfare; but resist it when change feels imposed, opaque, or misaligned with their values.