Public Policies to deal with the Covid-19 crisis
The Brussels based “think tank” Bruegel has released a report in which it makes an in-depth analysis of public guaranteed credit programs, in France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom. The report assesses the difficult political trade-offs that influence the size and design of support programs –i.e. minimizing cost versus broadening its scope- and finds interesting conclusions to explain why in some countries their usage has been much higher than in others.
- Same ingredients but different recipes: Fiscal policy tool-kit to deal with the crisis has been pretty similar among European countries. Public guaranteed loans programs have been dominant in terms of relative size (between 14% and 20% of GDP in the 5 countries of the analysis) versus other kind of public support measures. European governments have also provided a full range of other non-credit support measures to help their SMEs to overcome the crisis, such as tax deferrals, wages subsidies, direct grants, recapitalization schemes and loan deferrals. The weight of these non-credit support measures varies from 8% of GDP in Italy to 7% in France and UK, or 3% in Spain and 14% in Germany.
- Size, design and usage of public guaranteed loan programs may depend on the combination of several factors such as the structure of the countries, the severity of the crisis, the liquidity and financial position of the companies before the crisis or the political trade-offs as “some governments prioritized direct transfers over credit support, so that generous grant schemes, for instance, may be counterbalanced by less generous credit support”.
- However there is a correlation between the higher availability of other non-credit support and the final take up of the public guaranteed loan programs by the SMEs: The report finds that on average “firms’ need for credit support is determined to a great extent by the availability of public support from other non-credit support programs” such as business grants, tax deferrals, direct recapitalization and labour support schemes.
- According to the report, Spain is the country with the highest usage of their public guaranteed loan programs (63% of the total amount available, equal to 9% of GDP) while Germany is the lowest (9% of the total amount available, equal to approx. 1% of GDP) and at the same time is the country with the lowest non- credit support program for companies.
Filter results
According to @IMF, the capacity of fiscal and monetary policy to mitigate financial stability risks is more limited today than it was during much of the past two decades, given high debt levels and inflation in many jurisdictions.
According to Ramón Casilda, “it is no longer just a matter of Spanish capital investing in Latin America, but also of Latin American capital using Spain as a European base,” reinforcing a more balanced transatlantic economic space.
According to José Carlos Díez, Professor of Economics at the University of Alcalá, Spanish households have access to some of the cheapest mortgages in Europe, with interest rates below both Euribor and long-term government bond yields.
According to the IEE, Spain's business tax burden exceeds the European Union average, both as a share of total tax revenues and as a percentage of GDP.
AEB, CECA and UNACC propose measures to increase banks' lending capacity by more than €2 trillion in the euro area, including over €250 billion in Spain, providing additional resources to strengthen banks and finance new investment.
According to Boston Consulting Group, regulation brought in after the GFC strengthened the financial sector’s resilience but institutionalized bias towards removing all risk over economic growth.
According to Ramón Casilda, the EU–Mercosur agreement will generate annual tariff savings of around €4 billion, which is significantly higher than the savings expected under the agreements with Canada and Japan.
Economist José Carlos Díez notes that Spain’s banking sector has an excess of deposits and sufficient liquidity to meet the credit demand of companies and households, and does so at the lowest interest rates in Europe, according to the ECB.
According to CEPS, regulatory and supervisory complexity acts as a structural constraint on integration, investment and market depth, with costs that weigh most heavily on smaller institutions, new entrants and cross-border business models.
According to the ECB, an efficient, secure and integrated payment system would strengthen the international role of the euro and deliver benefits such as lower financing costs, reduced exposure to exchange rate fluctuations and greater protection against sanctions.
According to the IEA one key debate in the EU on financial regulation simplification is whether to explicitly include competitiveness, efficiency or contribution to growth as objectives of the regulatory agencies, following the UK example.
According to IE University’s Center for the Governance of Change, deeper and more integrated financial markets would strengthen the euro’s global role. This requires, among other elements, resilient and interoperable payment systems and completing the banking union.